Compliance Operations

Compliance works better when someone runs it.

Most compliance programs are not badly designed. They are unattended.

22 takes ownership of the recurring operational work so the program you built still exists next quarter.

Build an operating compliance program See engagement options

The hardest part of compliance isn't creating the first version. It's making sure the program still exists six months later.

The cadence

Recurring work with dates and owners.

Compliance calendar

An annual view of what is due, when, and who is responsible. Nothing depends on someone remembering.

Policy review cycles

Policies reviewed on a schedule, updated when the business changes, and approved with a record of it.

Risk reviews

The risk register revisited on a cadence, with treatment decisions documented as they are made.

Vendor reviews

A repeatable process for material vendors, so third-party risk is a routine rather than a scramble.

Control and access reviews

Periodic reviews where applicable, with evidence captured as the review happens.

Training coordination

Security and policy training scheduled, tracked, and evidenced without chasing people individually.

Remediation tracking

Open items with owners and dates, escalated when they stall rather than discovered during an audit.

Customer requirements

Contractual and customer-driven obligations tracked alongside framework requirements.

Executive reporting

A concise recurring view of status, priorities, risks, and blockers for leadership.

Common questions

What does compliance program management actually include?

A compliance calendar with real dates, policy review cycles, periodic risk reviews, vendor reviews, access and control reviews where applicable, training coordination, remediation tracking, customer requirements, audit preparation, and reporting to leadership. The common thread is that each item has an owner and a date.

We already have policies. Is that enough?

Policies are a starting point. An auditor and a serious customer both want evidence that the policy describes what the company does, that it has been reviewed recently, and that people are aware of it. That maintenance is the program.

Who is accountable if something slips?

22 is accountable for the program running: for tracking, escalating, and reporting. Your team remains accountable for decisions and for technical work only you can perform. We make it obvious which is which.

How much internal time does this take?

Less than running it yourselves, but not zero. Expect a recurring working session and periodic focused requests. We batch requests so your engineers are interrupted deliberately rather than constantly.

Put it on a cadence.

If your compliance program only moves when a customer pushes it, the schedule is being set by someone else.

Talk to 22 Explore 22 Compliance