22 Compliance Group Logo - Outsourced Compliance Company

SOC 2

SOC 2 Readiness Checklist for Startups

The work that actually has to exist before an auditor arrives, organized so a lean team can work through it without stopping product.

By 22 Compliance Group Published Reviewed 9 min read

SOC 2 readiness for a startup comes down to seven areas: scope, policies, access control, infrastructure and monitoring, vendor management, evidence, and the operating cadence that keeps all of it alive through the observation period. This checklist covers each one and flags where lean teams usually get stuck.

It assumes what is typically true: strong engineering, thin documentation, and nobody whose job this is.

1. Scope

Decide this first and deliberately. Scope drives cost, timeline, and evidence burden more than any other decision, and it is the easiest place to accidentally double the work.

  • Confirm which Trust Services Criteria apply. Security is the common baseline. Availability, confidentiality, processing integrity, and privacy are added when a customer requires them or the business genuinely warrants it.
  • Define which systems, environments, and products are in scope, and write down what is deliberately excluded.
  • Confirm the legal entity being examined.
  • Ask your customer whether they need Type I or Type II, and by when.

Where teams get stuck: adding criteria because they sound responsible. Each one carries controls, evidence, and audit cost. Add them when there is a reason.

2. Policies

Policies need to describe how your company actually operates. A downloaded template describing a company you are not will fail at the first auditor interview, because the auditor will ask an engineer what happens in practice.

A typical set includes:

  • Information security policy
  • Access control policy
  • Change management policy
  • Incident response plan
  • Business continuity and disaster recovery
  • Risk management policy
  • Vendor and third-party management
  • Data classification and handling
  • Acceptable use
  • Secure development practices
  • Onboarding and offboarding procedures

Each one needs a named owner, an approval record, and a review date.

Where teams get stuck: writing aspirational policies. If the policy says quarterly access reviews and you do them annually, you have created a finding rather than a control.

3. Access control

This is where auditors look first and where startups are often stronger than they expect.

  • Single sign-on across critical systems where feasible
  • Multi-factor authentication enforced, particularly for administrative access
  • Documented provisioning and deprovisioning procedures
  • Periodic access reviews, performed and evidenced
  • Least privilege applied and reviewable
  • Separate production and development access
  • Offboarding that reliably removes access, with a record

Where teams get stuck: offboarding. Access lingers in the tools nobody thinks of as systems: the analytics dashboard, the status page, the shared password vault.

4. Infrastructure and monitoring

  • Encryption in transit and at rest, documented
  • Logging and monitoring with defined retention
  • Vulnerability management with a defined remediation cadence
  • Backup procedures, and evidence that restoration has been tested
  • Change management with review before production deploys
  • Infrastructure configuration documented

Where teams get stuck: backup restoration testing. Backups usually exist. Evidence that someone verified a restore usually does not.

5. Vendor management

  • An inventory of vendors with access to systems or data
  • Criticality assessment for each
  • Collected security documentation for material vendors
  • A documented review process and cadence
  • Contract terms covering security obligations

Where teams get stuck: discovering the vendor list is longer than anyone believed, because tools were adopted by individual teams with a company card.

6. Evidence

For Type II, evidence has to be generated through the period, not assembled at the end. Decide up front:

  • What evidence each control produces
  • Who produces it and on what schedule
  • Where it is stored and how it is labeled
  • How completeness is checked before the audit

Where teams get stuck: assuming evidence can be reconstructed. Some can. A quarterly review that did not happen cannot.

7. Operating cadence

This is the item that decides whether the whole checklist survives contact with a normal quarter.

  • A compliance calendar with owners and dates
  • Recurring reviews actually scheduled, not intended
  • Remediation tracked with escalation when items stall
  • A regular status view for leadership
  • A named person accountable for the program moving

Where teams get stuck: all of it. The first six sections are project work with a visible finish line. This one is indefinite, and it is the first thing to lapse when a release slips or a founder gets pulled into fundraising.

The honest summary

Most startups can complete sections one through six. The failure mode is section seven, and it does not surface until the observation period is half over and the quarterly review nobody scheduled has not happened twice.

That is a structural problem rather than a discipline problem. It resolves by giving the work an owner, whether that is an internal hire or an outsourced compliance office. It does not resolve by trying harder.

Questions

How long does this checklist take to work through?
It depends entirely on what already exists and how much time your team can commit. A company with documented infrastructure and clear ownership moves considerably faster than one starting from nothing. Anyone quoting a universal timeline has not looked at your environment.
Do we need all of these policies?
The set varies with scope and how your business operates. What matters more than the count is that each policy describes real practice, has an owner, and gets reviewed on a schedule.
Can compliance software handle most of this?
It handles a meaningful portion of the mechanical work: monitoring, evidence collection, reminders, and templates. It does not decide scope, write policies matching your practice, or chase a stalled remediation item.
What if we find something we cannot fix before the audit?
Document it, assess the risk, and decide deliberately whether to remediate, accept, or apply a compensating control. Auditors are used to imperfect environments. What they respond badly to is undocumented gaps discovered during fieldwork.
Who should own this checklist internally?
One named person, with enough authority to set priorities across engineering and leadership. Distributed ownership is the most common reason readiness stalls.

Next step

If section seven is the part you already know will be a problem, that is the honest place to start. See how SOC 2 readiness works at 22, or tell us where you are.

Compliance needs an owner.

When the reading is done and the work still has no home, that is the conversation to have.